data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bbe9/3bbe9bdbcdc7513779a1e35ca56f6dfc919a5563" alt="Help Stick Girl A stickgirl character with blonde hair and an orange bow asking for help."
Filing the notice is the only way to really handle this, but the process is slow. Not only does it take time once you file the reports, if a person has copied a lot of your posts and are hosted on Blogger, the process involves including ALL the URLs copied, both from your blog, and from the copied blog.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77af6/77af674264c09d87d82b92d0d626b82b4b379018" alt="My Articles A screenshot of my content on a scraper's blog."
Once you've completed that, you're ready to file the DMCA notice. No, you can't just give the main URL of the blog that copied you and say remove this blog. You have to list the individual URLs - and yes, I know this is frustrating and time consuming, but unless you complete and submit the process properly, nothing may be done at all.
This (screenshot above) is not my blog, but it sure as heck looks like my content - my cartoon characters, my textual contents, most of them are also the titles of my posts. Even worse is the fact that this person has also claimed the copyright for my blog. And that was, as they say ... "the straw that broke the camel's back". I spent a day searching the blog for my content, made a list, and then got the list of URLs from my site. And filed the DMCA report.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db6cf/db6cf86b54cbce747e40c1f57dc942ad44e753b0" alt="Stickgirl India Stickgirl figure dressed in an Indian sari."
The person receiving the notice will be able to file a counter-claim (which would be foolish in this case, since they can't prove they wrote the content.) and the process take several weeks from the time that person receives the DMCA notice. They have something like 14 days to respond (unless that's changed recently). How long it takes for them to receive the notice after you file can depend on how many notices have been filed recently.
This isn't the first time I've filed DMCA notices, but it's the first time I've filed one through Blogger. It's also the first time I've filed one with that many URLs at one time, previously the most I've filed for was 7 at one time.
People who do such things (scrape or copy content) are completely annoying to the people who create the original work. It's not exactly a legal crime of huge proportions, but people can be sued for doing such a thing, particularly if it can be proven that the person's use of the original content has caused harm to the originator (financially, or by reputation). I don't intend to go that far, and doing so takes much more work, and usually involves the need of a legal representative (which will cost you money, especially if you lose the case).
For me, the most annoying thing of it all that the person has taken credit for the work I've done, and copied some of my ad code, and I won't sit still for that. Dumber still is the fact that some of my content still has my author bio at the end. That in itself would provide enough proof to the DMCA complaint that I am the originator of the content.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3c93/c3c93173610224eeff8d47f834ef1e952e23fe00" alt=""
And while I know there are some of you that would like to retaliate when it happens to you ... that would make you no better than the perpetrator. It might be fun to think about sending out some little piece of script that would wipe the blog off the internet, but that's the wrong way to handle this sort of situation and in the end ... it would only give you a passing satisfaction. Doing the wrong thing in response to another wrong thing is never the way to deal with an issue.
Always use the right methods ... be the "better man" and do the right thing.
posted by J.Gracey Stinson
0 comments:
Post a Comment